It was expected that the Vries would go this way in his program.

He has no official information about the investigation. No contact with the ALE, FBI, KLPD and Prosecutors; who definitely knows more about the case than the family, internet sites and tabloid filled with JM's inaccuracies.
He has only one side of the story.

He has no details of the interrogations and over the 2.000 pages of information that the ALE and prosecutors have, only 100+, which is the same documents we have on the internet that was given to the family by the lawyers that used these in the court sessions early on and they leaked on the internet.

They only have a small portion of over 14 months of investigation. They are going to play PR with less than 200 pages of documentation and they will have to rely on Beth's words of what happened before, during and after Natalee's disappearance.... you know, 'cause she know.

There are over 200 witnesses' statements, he might only have 10. Same used in the civil suit, yes, remember that fake story they wanted to tell in the NY court?

So, he will be making a program based on the documents given to him by the family, the same used to show the 500+ posters on different sites that the suspects are guilty of murder, rape, kidnapping and gang raping.... but still could not proof that even a crime was committed.

I just hope he shows one of the PV's on TV.

ALE has already had all or part of its information (which is much more than De Vries has) reviewed by several teams of its own, by Dutch specialists, by the FBI and by an officer from the Dutch Antilles if I recall correctly. And now, for a final review by KLPD. It's unlikely that any stones have been left unturned, and if there still should be any, they won't be in those few of the most incriminating records that De Vries has and that countless people have already been chewing on. If Joran should be guilty, and if that is De Vries' angle, then his only chance of breaking the case is if someone brings in new evidence or if someone close to the investigation has evidence of corruption. Both seem very unlikely to me. If he has fallen for Beth's rhetoric's, as so many have before him, I don't think he can do more than re-hash the same old stuff. If he wants to find new points of view, he should be looking in alternative directions, which have not been as actively pursued as the Joran-did-it angle. He's more likely to find new and neglected leads there.